Ursa   meteoptic-l/summary  

 

meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi

message archive

This is meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi message archive. Note, your can reply the messages on this page only if your are already subscribed the list.

» To the end of the list/message

 

From: Marko Riikonen (Marko.Riikonen_at_hidden_email_address.net)
Date: 05/18/1995



I think exhaust impurities do not have much to do with the formation of circumhorizontal arc. The halo is formed in the plate crystals with 90 deg refracting angle, so it is often very colorful haloform. And of cource, the bigger crystals, the better colors. I think the contrails were formed on a little different level than surrounding clouds (if the surrounding clouds were not upper level clouds (Cs/Ci), then they can't make halos anyway. But let's assume the surrounding clouds were upper level clouds), so the meteorolocigal conditions have been also different on that level, i.e. different vapor saturation and temperature. So the conditions at the place where contrails were formed were favorable for plate crystal formation but the surrounding cloud level had no conditions for plate crystal formation.

        Exhaust impurities could have also something to do with the plate crystal formation by causing heterogeneous nucleation that could favor plate crystal formation.

        If someone wants to read about airborne ice crystal studies, then journals like "Journal of Atmospheric Sciences" and "Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan" are full of information. Not to name any particular papers - there are heaps of them.

                 Marko Riikonen