|
meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi
message archive
This is meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi message archive.
Note, your can reply the messages on this page only if your
are already subscribed the list.
» To the end of the list/message
p.s. I realize that I have played fast and loose with the spelling of
"parhelion". Sorry.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Meteorological (atmospheric) optics
[mailto:METEOPTIC_at_listserv.funet.fi] On Behalf Of Kevin Boyle
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:37 AM
To: METEOPTIC_at_listserv.funet.fi
Subject: Re: [METEOPTIC] Reflected sun dog
Hi James etc
So you were seeing two different reflections with both eyes. Both eyes
can't
catch the same beams of light can they? And your original "parahelion"
will
be the same, I assume.
Sorry James I didn't phrase the question correctly, my fault.
Is the reflection of Jame's parhelion the same as the original?
>
> What I mean is, was James seeing the same light beams refracted BEFORE
> reflected off the water? If not, then technically he is seeing four
> different parhelions? (If each eye sees it's own image?).
That is, each eye sees its own original "parahelion".
Looking at the reflection each eye sees its own reflection.
See what the others say.
What you say about the change in contrast of image in the reflection
makes
sense.
I have noticed that when viewing sundogs and coronas in water surfaces.
Keep up the good work viewing!
Regards
Kevin
> Kevin et al:
>
> No, it wasn't "the same" parahelion. It was the one seen from the
water
> surface at the point of reflection.
>
> In fact, for a time it seemed that the colors of the reflected
> parahelion were slightly more intense than "my" parahelion. I wonder,
> though, if that wasn't because of increased contrast in the
reflection;
> the brightness of the surrounding sky was attenuated somewhat. Does
> that make sense?
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Meteorological (atmospheric) optics
> [mailto:METEOPTIC_at_listserv.funet.fi] On Behalf Of Kevin Boyle
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: METEOPTIC_at_listserv.funet.fi
> Subject: Re: [METEOPTIC] Reflected sun dog
>
> Hi all
>
> Is the reflection of Jame's parhelion the same as the original?
>
> What I mean is, was James seeing the same light beams refracted then
> reflected off the water? If not, then technically he is seeing four
> different parhelions? (If each eye sees it's own image?).
>
> I know this applies to halos and rainbows. If fact let's complicate
> things
> (then again hopefully someone will have the answer) can you ever see
the
> same rainbow? Taking into account raindrops are falling and the light
> waves
> are being reflected and refracted by new raindrops.
>
> Regards
>
> Kevin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: James McGough <jmcgough_at_BLARG.NET>
> To: <METEOPTIC_at_listserv.funet.fi>
> Sent: 06 January 2003 01:36
> Subject: [METEOPTIC] Reflected sun dog
>
>
> > The weather here near Seattle has unexpectedly cleared and dried as
a
> > high pressure system has begun to dominate the area.
> >
> > This weekend my mother, my wife, and I went to spend time at our
small
> > family cabin on the shores of North Bay, Case Inlet, a branch of
Puget
> > Sound.
> >
> > This morning the sun rose behind a thin layer of high clouds,
creating
> a
> > beautiful, bright, definitely multi-hued, parahelion.
> >
> > The nice thing was that as I came out of the cabin just after
waking,
> to
> > see what ducks and other birds were around, I first saw the
parahelion
> > reflected in the water. Only then did I look up to see the
> "original."
> >
> > The reflection continued for maybe 15 or 20 minutes. This was the
> first
> > time I had ever seen such a reflection. And me without a camera!
> >
> > Jim McGough
> > Seattle
|