Ursa   meteoptic-l/summary  

 

meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi

message archive

This is meteoptic-l [ät] ursa.fi message archive. Note, your can reply the messages on this page only if your are already subscribed the list.

» To the end of the list/message

 

From: PEKKOLA J MARKO (JMPEKKOLA_at_hidden_email_address.net)
Date: 06/29/1995



Subhorizon halo challenge ; DO YOU FLY?

I guess you people fly sometimes. There is a less known international challenge going on to photograph  for the first time all halo forms, which yet have escaped the eye of camera.

The rare halos that are encountered above the horizon,  ie. on the sky are relatively well taken care of. However the rare halo forms that are found under the horizon (visible only from an airplane flying above ice crystals or from high tower during low level ice crystal display) are lousily covered.

Of the subhorizon halos by far the most common is the subsun; simple reflection of sun situated as far belove the horizon as the sun is above. Occasionally  the subparhelia are found some 22 degrees on both sides of the subsun. This is much more difficult  to see, but is still among the relatively easy subhorizon targets. Then I recently flew to Alaska from Finland (Helsinki/Kopenhagen/Seattle/ Anchorage/Fairbanks) the subparhelia were visible on only two occasions and their summed up visibility  was only some 20 minutes.

Subparhelic circle - a white ring of much resemblance  of its upper counterpart (parhelic
circle) is rarely seen. The first picture of it I am aware of was published in Scorer's Cloud Atlas of World (1972). After that one only some half a dozen photos presenting that circle have come about in the meterological literature. I've newer seen the subparhelic circle myself, but for example airline pilots probably see it several times within one year.

THREE SUBHORIZON PHENOMENA TO CATCH There is at least three subhorizon halo forms, which are theoretically bright enough and obvious to exist in nature, but which either have newer been photographed or more probably: the photographer  has not understood the value of his shots and thus these things have newer appeared in the atmospheric  optics journals or in halo books. These gorcious  challenges are the following;

  1. Sub-120 parhelia. Bright white spots 120 left and right from subsun situated on the subparhelic circle. This should not be immensely difficult and thus its currently a disgrace that no-one has yet come up with shots of this halo form.
  2. Sub-73 parhelia. Fainter spots of light, which do not have bright enough counterpart above the horizon, only here in "downstairs". Newer observed.
  3. Subcircumzenith arc. Found surrounding the nadire and thus a very difficult target from an airline plane. But from a small aircraft with the pilot himself determined to catch this nature phenomenon for the first time ...it should work out eventually.

QUESTIONS Do you have already any material like this (at least subparhelic circles?) hidden in your drawers? Do you know any small - less known - aviational magazines which might have published big subhorizon halo displays ? Books by Greenler R. (1980; Rainbows, Halos and Glories) and by Tape W.(1994; Atmospheric Halos) are and the one by Scorer R. (1972 Cloud Atlas...) are at the moment virtually almost only places to encounter good photographs of these subhorizon effects.

I am making currently a book on halo phenomena. If you have any good halo photos, or any other interesting stuff to tell (of the subhorizon halos or other halos) here is my contact information;

Marko Pekkola
Rautalammintie 5 A 9
00550 Helsinki
Finland

tel: +358-0-765196 / +358-79-530304 (15th July-15th August) fax: +358-0-657728
e-mail: marko.pekkola_at_helsinki.fi

By the way, thanks for Michael Boschat of the sprites messages. I for one vote these as the most interesting mails yet in this news group.

Regards, Marko